Comparison
FUE vs DHI hair transplant: an honest comparison
FUE and DHI are based on the same principle — transplanting grafts one by one. The main difference is in how the grafts are placed. Both can give natural results; the choice depends on the area, the density needed, and the surgeon's experience.
Which one suits you?
DHI can have an advantage in narrow areas for high density and a non-shaven option; FUE is efficient for large areas. Method choice depends on the degree of hair loss and the surgeon's assessment.
| FUE | DHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Placement | Channel is opened first, then the graft is inserted | A special pen (Choi) creates the channel and places the graft at the same time |
| Shaving | Donor area is usually shaved | A non-shaven option is more often possible |
| Density | Suitable for large areas | Allows higher-density placement |
| Procedure duration | Relatively short | Usually longer |
| Recovery | Similar | Similar |
| Ideal use | Large balding areas | Narrow/precise areas, hairline |
This comparison is general information and not medical advice. Results are individual.